This article was contributed by BoostMe
When you’re aiming to boost your repository’s visibility, choosing the right service is essential. Selecting a provider that offers GitHub Stars and Followers helps build credibility for your developer profile and open-source projects. By using these services safely, you can create the social proof needed to attract genuine developer interest. I compared seven popular services to see which ones are actually worth considering for GitHub growth.
1. BoostMe: Top Recommendation for Reliable GitHub Growth Services
Overall Score: 9.5/10
After comparing the available options, BoostMe is my top choice for buying GitHub Stars and Followers. What makes it stand out is not just the price, but the combination of package flexibility, simple ordering, account security, customer support and additional GitHub growth services.
GitHub Stars and Followers in one place
BoostMe offers dedicated services for GitHub Stars, GitHub Followers and GitHub Forks, so you can build different parts of your developer presence without using separate providers.
That’s useful if you’re launching an open-source project and want to strengthen both the repository and your personal developer profile.
Affordable packages for different growth stages
I particularly like the range of package sizes. You don’t have to jump straight into a large order.
For GitHub Stars, packages currently range from 10 Stars for $2.35 to 2,000 Stars for $303.90.
For GitHub Followers, packages start at 10 Followers for $3.90, with options going up to 2,000 Followers.
For a new project, I’d start small and scale gradually rather than buying a large package immediately.
No GitHub password required
This is one of the first things I check when evaluating any third-party growth service.
BoostMe doesn’t require your GitHub password or account login. For Stars, you provide the URL of the repository you want to promote; for Followers, you provide your GitHub profile URL.
That makes the ordering process considerably simpler and means you’re not handing over access to your GitHub account.
30-day money-back guarantee
BoostMe also offers a 30-day money-back guarantee, which gives buyers an additional layer of reassurance when testing the service.
I always consider a clearly stated refund policy a positive sign when comparing paid growth providers.
24/7 customer support
If something goes wrong with an order, having accessible support matters. BoostMe advertises 24/7 customer support, so customers can contact the team when they need help with their order.
SSL-secured payments
BoostMe states that transactions are protected with SSL encryption. More importantly, because the service doesn’t require your GitHub login credentials, you aren’t giving a third party direct access to your account.
Useful if you’re starting a new repository
One of the more practical uses I see for BoostMe is giving a new project some initial social proof.
A repository with a polished README, useful documentation, active development and a reasonable number of Stars can make a stronger first impression than an otherwise identical repository with no visible traction.
Of course, Stars shouldn’t be treated as a replacement for genuine developer interest. I’d use them as one part of a broader GitHub growth strategy, alongside open-source contributions, community promotion, documentation and consistent development.
Implementation Scenario: Giving a new developer tool an initial push
Scenario: Imagine you’ve just launched a small developer tool on GitHub. The code works, the README is polished and you’ve started promoting it, but the repository has very little visible traction.
Instead of immediately ordering thousands of Stars, I’d take a gradual approach.
I’d start with a small BoostMe package, make sure the repository is properly presented and then continue promoting it through relevant developer communities. As organic traffic and genuine interest increase, the repository can build on that initial visibility.
The important part isn’t the number of purchased Stars by itself. The objective is to create an initial visibility signal while the project develops real users, contributors, forks, issues and organic Stars.
BoostMe’s pricing makes this approach relatively accessible. For example, 50 GitHub Stars currently cost $10.60, while 100 cost $19.90.
My takeaway: I wouldn’t use BoostMe to make an inactive repository look artificially huge. I’d use a small package as part of a broader launch strategy, then let genuine project quality and developer engagement take over.
2. Followdeh
Overall Score: 9.0/10
Followdeh is one of the more interesting alternatives because it has a dedicated GitHub section covering Stars, Followers, Forks and Watchers.
The service currently lists GitHub Star packages from 20 to 1,000, with the 20-Star package priced at $5.20 on its English Stars page.
It also says that orders use paced delivery and that customers don’t need to provide passwords, login codes, recovery emails, or 2FA information.
I particularly like the fact that Followdeh covers more than just Stars. If you’re trying to build a broader repository profile, having Stars, Forks and Watchers available from the same provider can be convenient.
Best for: developers who want several types of GitHub engagement from one dashboard.
My verdict: a solid second choice, particularly if you want more than Stars and Followers.
3. SocialPlug
Overall Score: 8.5/10
SocialPlug has dedicated GitHub services for Stars, Followers and Forks, so it’s another provider I’d put on the shortlist.
Its GitHub Stars page currently advertises packages starting at $0.201 per Star, orders of up to 1,000 Stars, card and crypto payments and no signup or login requirement.
The ordering process is straightforward:
- Select a package.
- Provide your repository URL.
- Complete payment.
SocialPlug also says that no GitHub password is required.
Best for: buyers who prioritize a quick checkout and broad package selection.
My verdict: one of the stronger alternatives to BoostMe.
4. Media Mister
Overall Score: 7.5/10
Media Mister has been operating since 2012 and offers a very large catalog of social-media marketing services. It reports customers across more than 190 countries and publishes a satisfaction rating on its site.
The main advantage here is experience. Media Mister isn’t a new site that appeared yesterday and started selling engagement packages.
It also emphasizes manual delivery, no bots or automation and says customers don’t need to provide login credentials.
However, there’s an important distinction: Media Mister is a broad social-media provider, rather than a GitHub-specialist service.
Best for: buyers who prefer an established, broad social-growth provider.
My verdict: worth comparing, but not my first choice for GitHub specifically.
5. GetAFollower
Overall Score: 7.0/10
GetAFollower is another long-running social-growth provider. The company says it was founded in 2011 and currently operates under Oasis Technology Solutions FZ-LLC in the UAE.
Its catalog covers numerous social platforms and engagement types. The company also says it doesn’t require customers to provide passwords or login credentials and offers customer support through live chat.
Where I’d be more cautious is GitHub-specific availability. Its current public material is much more heavily focused on mainstream social networks, so I wouldn’t assume a GitHub package is available simply because you’ve seen GetAFollower mentioned in general “buy followers” lists.
Best for: comparing prices and providers if a suitable GitHub package is currently offered.
My verdict: potentially useful, but verify the exact GitHub service before paying.
6. SMM Laboratory
Overall Score: 6.5/10
SMM Laboratory is another established name in the broader social-media marketing market.
Its current terms describe promotional services and explicitly state that it does not guarantee that purchased followers will interact with future content.
That’s actually an important distinction when evaluating services like these.
A delivered follower is not the same thing as an engaged community member.
If your goal is GitHub visibility, I’d rather have a smaller number of relevant-looking signals alongside genuine repository activity than a huge follower number that does nothing for the project.
SMM Laboratory also states that payment processing is protected and that confidential payment information does not enter its online store.
Best for: buyers already familiar with traditional SMM panels.
My verdict: I’d rank it below the GitHub-focused providers on this list.
7. NiubiStar
Overall Score: 9.0/10
NiubiStar is the most specialized option on this list.
Instead of presenting GitHub as one item among dozens of social platforms, NiubiStar positions itself specifically around DevTools, AI applications and open-source projects.
Its approach focuses on GitHub social proof across Stars, Forks and Watchers. The provider says customers submit a public repository URL, after which it creates a structured visibility plan and uses staged delivery.
I also found an interesting feature called Niubi Lens, which uses comparisons between open-source projects and offers discounts for qualifying cold-start repositories.
That’s a nice sign that the company understands the developer audience rather than simply repackaging generic Instagram-style follower services.
Best for: AI tools, developer products and new open-source repositories.
My verdict: definitely worth considering if your project is genuinely developer-focused.
Final verdict
If I had to choose one provider today, BoostMe would be my first choice because its GitHub offering is clearly structured around Stars, Followers and Forks, its pricing starts low enough for testing and its ordering process doesn’t require GitHub credentials.
Followdeh and SocialPlug are my next two choices, particularly if you want more flexible delivery or additional GitHub engagement types.
NiubiStar is the most interesting specialist option for AI, DevTools and open-source products.
Media Mister and GetAFollower are better viewed as established general-purpose growth providers, while SMM Laboratory is a more traditional SMM-panel choice.
Most importantly, don’t treat purchased Stars as the finish line. Use them, if at all, as a small initial visibility signal, then let the quality of your code, documentation and community do the heavy lifting.
FAQs
1. Is it safe to buy GitHub Stars?
The main security rule is simple: never give a third-party service your GitHub password, 2FA code or account credentials. Providers such as BoostMe, Followdeh and SocialPlug state that their ordering processes only require a public repository URL.
2. Can I buy GitHub Stars without giving my password?
Yes. Some providers specifically support URL-only ordering. BoostMe says you only need to provide the URL of the repository you want to promote.
3. How much does it cost to buy GitHub Stars?
Prices vary significantly by provider and package size. For example, BoostMe currently starts at $2.35 for 10 Stars, while its 1,000-Star package is $160.50.
4. What are GitHub Stars used for?
A GitHub Star lets a user bookmark a repository they find interesting. A higher Star count can therefore function as a visible popularity or social-proof signal, although it does not prove that a project is widely used.
6. Can I buy GitHub Followers for my developer profile?
Yes, several providers on this list offer GitHub Followers. BoostMe, Followdeh and SocialPlug all currently advertise GitHub follower services.
7. Will buying GitHub Stars make my repository trend?
No provider can honestly guarantee that. Stars are only one part of repository visibility. GitHub activity, project quality, relevance, engagement and genuine developer interest also matter.
8. Can I buy GitHub Stars for a new repository?
Yes, providers generally allow orders for public repositories, subject to their individual requirements. For a new repository, I’d start with a small package rather than making an unusually large jump.
9. How many GitHub Stars should I buy?
There isn’t a universal number. I’d base the amount on your repository’s existing size and stage. A small, proportional increase is more sensible than trying to manufacture hundreds or thousands of Stars overnight.
10. Are bought GitHub Followers real?
Be careful with this wording. Providers may advertise Followers as coming from real or active accounts, but a buyer cannot independently verify every account’s quality simply from the sales page. Treat “real” as a provider claim, not a guarantee of genuine interest in your project.
11. Can buying GitHub Stars improve SEO?
Not directly. GitHub Stars are not a substitute for traditional SEO. They can contribute to a project’s overall visibility and social proof, but you shouldn’t buy Stars expecting them to function like backlinks or directly increase Google rankings.
Disclaimer: Using third-party services to increase GitHub stars and followers carries risk, especially when they rely on purchased followers, fake accounts, bots or tactics that violate GitHub’s policies. Low-quality providers may harm your profile by weakening engagement quality, reducing account credibility, affecting visibility or or increasing the risk of issues such as follower drops, limited reach, account restrictions, bans or or even account closure.
To reduce these risks, it’s important to choose reliable providers that use safe, policy-conscious growth methods. The services mentioned here do not rely on fake followers or artificial engagement. Instead, they focus on targeted promotion, profile optimization and strategic marketing to help your account reach real users, attract genuine followers and support organic growth while staying aligned with GitHub’s guidelines.
The editorial staff of the Los Gatan was not involved in the creation of this content. The content is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, medical or professional advice from this publication. Readers should consult qualified professionals regarding their individual circumstances. The Los Gatan disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the information contained in this content.
